Are ‘Hot or Not’ Type Apps a Little Creepy? – Stu Bradley

 

‘All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.’
- William Shakespeare, As You Like It

‘Every street’s a catwalk when you’re looking like that.’
- Rogue Traders, Fashion…aka that song off the start of Gok Wan’s show.

As the above quotes, of varying literary credibility, illustrate, man’s occupation with appearance is neither new nor fleeting.  People spend hours (or in my girlfriend’s case, sometimes days) getting ready for tasks as trivial as going food shopping.  This might seem pretty ridiculous – have you ever heard of a couple telling their grandchildren they met reaching for the same avocado? – but it’s something that frightening number of people seem to do…So, apps and websites allowing people to rate people and discuss their attractiveness could only be successful, right?  Well, not exactly.

Are you being snapped?

The first site of its kind was probably Hot Or Not, which allowed users to upload photos which other users would then rate as hot or, umm, not.  Hence the name.  The rating system was later switched to a scale of 1-10, though this did nothing to stop people giving members of their sex the lowest possible rating to make their own rating seem higher.  Some people have too much time on their hands.

Last year came FitFinder, a website that allowed people on University campuses to post about attractive individuals wherever they happened to be hanging around.  Interestingly, the reason UCL gave for putting pressure on the site’s creator to shut it down was not allegations of poor taste or subversive posters using the site as ‘MunterHunter’, but because it was too distracting.  The site has since relaunched as Floxx, and I suppose in the interest of full disclosure, I better point out that I now work for them…

Recently, however, posting hotties has taken a turn that some find unsettling – taking covert pictures and putting them on websites like UniCrush,  TubeCrush and Hottie in the Library.  Now, most websites of this kind have a disclaimer proclaiming that because these photos are taken in a public space, yadda yadda, it’s all above board.  I vowed to stay away from the legal implications, because my legal expertise pretty much begins and ends with having seen Legally Blonde a few times.  Instead, I wanted to think a bit about the social implications.

In scientific terms (hah), the real issue is when something stops being banter and starts being creepy; when is the creepy line being crossed?  A case study – at University, a group captures one of their friends making out with a less than desirable female in a club.  They snap a pic on their iPhone, put it on Facebook and before long a smattering of tags like ‘fail whale’ and comments such as ‘did she Free your Willy steve-o?’ appear.  Though this may be in poor taste, surely no-one would argue that it’s creepy; it’s just boys being boys, right? Ok, let’s think about girls being girls.  ‘Does my butt look big in this?’  If you’ve ever watched a ‘90s sitcom, chances are you’ve heard girls asking their boyfriend or friends this question.  Apps like Fashism and Go Try It On now enable girls (and fashion conscious boys) to open up this question to thousands of users all over the world.  So…what’s the problem with apps that do very similar things but with content submitted by other users?

Of course, one of the key issues is consent, but things aren’t quite that easy – if an individual was comfortable enough to say ‘excuse me, can I post a picture of you on a website that shares really hot people?’ they’re probably outgoing enough to just strike up a flirty conversation with the other party.  Surely these apps are more targeted at shy people who aren’t used to starting up a conversation with a stranger they find attractive, something Floxx allows people to do.  However, as the old saying goes, a picture says a thousand words – one post on the site reads ‘Female, blonde hair. Petite, cute, wearing a floral dress. But given I’m in Topshop that doesn’t really narrow it down.’  There’s no mistaking a picture.

Ultimately, it all comes down to personal preference – as long as pictures are moderated to prevent gormless, unflattering poses appearing, I wouldn’t have a problem with my picture appearing on one of these sites.  Maybe it’s just my natural optimism, but I perceive sites like this as trying to open the world to strangers in a way that utopian science fiction envisaged, rather than closing interaction off to inner circles of friends.

So what do you think; would you be happy with someone snapping a pic of you and posting it on a ‘hottie database’ for all the world to see?

Stu Bradley

Related posts:

  1. 5 Questions With… Stu Bradley from Floxx (social media/apps)
About Mike McGrail

Mike McGrail is the owner of The Social Penguin Blog. He is in the process of setting up a digital marketing and communications consultancy. He likes scotch and leather-bound books. Follow Mike's ramblings on Twitter. He also resides on Google Plus here.

  • http://twitter.com/prettyoddfran Frances Revel

    I’m sticking with creepy. But no more so than vetting potential matches on a conventional internet dating site. Atleast on sites like Floxx you’re being honest about what you’re judging the person by – not making up some crap involving their personality. Case in point: people with no photos NEVER find matches.

    • http://www.thesocialpenguinblog.com Mike McGrail

      Hi Frances,

      Thanks for commenting! The whole photo thing applies to the social web too, if someone has no pic on say, Twitter, I’m unlikely to engage with them!

      • http://twitter.com/stu_bradley Stu Bradley

        Am I right in thinking the default Twitter image for someone with no pic is an egg? If so, they could just be social penguins who haven’t hatched yet ;)

      • http://twitter.com/stu_bradley Stu Bradley

        Am I right in thinking the default Twitter image for someone with no pic is an egg? If so, they could just be social penguins who haven’t hatched yet ;)

        • http://www.thesocialpenguinblog.com Mike McGrail

          This is correct! Perhaps they are penguins waiting to be brought in to the
          world! I will ask Dave…

        • http://www.thesocialpenguinblog.com Mike McGrail

          This is correct! Perhaps they are penguins waiting to be brought in to the
          world! I will ask Dave…

    • http://twitter.com/robzie81 Rob Zaleski

      So, ah, Frances. Where’s YOUR picture? ;-)

  • http://www.thesocialpenguinblog.com Mike McGrail

    Dave reckons you are being a bit daft. Sorry!

  • http://twitter.com/robzie81 Rob Zaleski

    I’m still out on this subject. It’s one thing to post pics of yourself for others to pass judgement on, but yet another for others to covertly post pictures of you for others to judge. It’s the same thing with Facebook’s face recognition tagging, the fact that it is automatically suggesting tagging is a little creepy. If someone isn’t paying attention and just tagging away, clicking confirm, you could even be tagged in situations that may not even involve you. Even with that, you at least have a Facebook profile, so you are sort of consenting to being part of an online social network. With others posting pics of you, you may not even be aware of it at all to be able to have it taken down. It’s easy to argue both sides strongly.

    • http://www.thesocialpenguinblog.com Mike McGrail

      Hi Rob,

      It’s an issue that is sure to polarise forever more! I guess some would love the ego boost of good ratings.

      • http://twitter.com/robzie81 Rob Zaleski

        True, but when the opposite happens it becomes a public display of ridicule that a person didn’t choose to participate in. So long as only beautiful people get posted, then I guess it is a good thing. Ha! :)

  • Stu

    You say the other organisations are doing things ‘better’; I would argue that as they are doing something completely different, you can’t even compare the two.

    If no-one cares about striking up conversations with shy people then I guess the multi billion dollar industry that is online dating will fail pretty soon, right…?

    Also, you refer to my ‘fear’ – I was simply positing a question and exploring the debate around it by suggesting concerns people might have or reasons they might like the sites in question. Not sure where the supposed fear appears.

    You say mentioning that I worked at Floxx was a shameless product placement; surely it’s better that I disclose that information and explain why I’m interested in the subject matter?